781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Hoisted on Her Own a Fraudulent Petard, or There’s Just No Damn Honor Among Frauds Anymore: Shea v. Cameron – Part 2

Thursday, April 05, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

It is tempting to dismiss the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s Shea v. Cameron as a confection of divorcing people behaving badly, and a tale of narcissistic comeuppance. But, the case actually has two important messages in it, for which we are grateful.

First, obviously, is that “not all human actions…have an avenue for legal recourse, no matter how much anger, sorrow, or anxiety they cause.” Those words would be well-posted over the courthouse door.

But second, the court underscored the gravity of the allegation “undue influence”, the key to many efforts to avoid enforcement of pre-marital and divorce agreements specifically, and to eschew responsibility for one’s own actions, more generally. The court aptly cited SJC precedent, in stating that:

    …a plaintiff must establish that the defendant overcame the will of the grantor …. [by]… some form of compulsion which coerces a person into doing something the person does not want to do.

And, in connection with Ms. Shea:

    …the undisputed evidence shows that [she] was in full command of her personal affairs and was neither ill, dependent nor enfeebled at the time of the transfer of real or personal property to Cameron.

Undue influence is a high bar, as well it should be.

 

Hoisted on Her Own a Fraudulent Petard, or There’s Just No Damn Honor Among Frauds Anymore: Shea v. Cameron – Part 1

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

It isn’t often that we get to see the phrase “joint stipulation of fraud”.

But, in the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s recent Shea v. Cameron, it is the perfect appetizer to a meal of mutual marital chicanery that resulted in the court’s decision to distance the itself from the:

    … “ingratitude, avarice, broken faith, brutal words, and heartless disregard of feelings of others,” which although blameworthy, are not legally compensable.

He lied about loving her. They married. He cheated. She filed for divorce. She withdrew her complaint. She filed a new complaint, this time for annulment. He snapped up that opportunity, only too happy to admit his faux amour.

Not so fast. After the parties presented their cooked-up annulment petition to the court, Ms. Shea served Mr. Cameron – on his way out of the courtroom, no less - with an complaint demanding a cookbook of damage remedies based on his “fraudulent inducement to marry”.

First, the Probate and Family Court, and then the Superior Court, kicked out Shea’s claims on summary judgment. But, the second judge “reported” the question to the Appeals Court, which took the matter up despite its procedural reservations. After a scholarly review of the history of various “heart balm” actions, the court wisely ended the matter for good, with unassailable logic:

  1. the law provides remedies for married persons when they break up, for equitable property division and support; and
  2. when the wife chose annulment instead of divorce, she gave up those remedies, since no marriage ever existed, a fiction of her own design.

Thus did Ms. Shea hoist herself, luring Mr. Cameron into admitting fraud, while plotting to then show him, but accidentally giving him a free pass, in the process.

There is just no honor in fraud anymore.

 



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Levine Dispute Resolutions mediation divorce mediator Massachusetts divorce mediators dispute resolution divorce process med-arb disputes med/arb Divorce Agreements divorce and family law Boston Massachusetts alimony divorce mediations divorce and family law mediators Baseball Arbitration rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC separation conciliation health insurance divorce arbitration divorced divorce agreement how baseball arbitration works mediations Levine Dispute Resolution Chouteau Levine Self-adjusting alimony orders family law mediation pre-ARA alimony Baseball lawyer Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family law arbitrator litigation special master support orders Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts divorce mediators family support alimony reform legislation Major League Baseball Arbitration health coverage private dispute resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce arbitrators arbitrator Baseball Players fraud divorce mediation lawyer-attended mediation divorce lawyers mediator Uniform Arbitration Act Family Law Arbitration divorce litigation LDRC Matrimonial Arbitration medical benefits General term alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts lawyers alimony high-risk methodology Massachusetts divorce lawyers alimony law facilitated negotiations mediators alimony orders family law arbitrators Divorce divorce judgment Same Sex Marriage child support family law Defense of Marriage Act divorce arbitrator Obamacare arbitrators DOMA Cohabitation SJC family mediation COLA self-adjusting alimony Child Support Guidelines annulment family and probate law disputes resolve disputes lawyers arbitration Alimony Reform Act MLB labor agreement traditional negotiations alimony statute