781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Hoisted on Her Own a Fraudulent Petard, or There’s Just No Damn Honor Among Frauds Anymore: Shea v. Cameron – Part 2

Thursday, April 05, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

It is tempting to dismiss the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s Shea v. Cameron as a confection of divorcing people behaving badly, and a tale of narcissistic comeuppance. But, the case actually has two important messages in it, for which we are grateful.

First, obviously, is that “not all human actions…have an avenue for legal recourse, no matter how much anger, sorrow, or anxiety they cause.” Those words would be well-posted over the courthouse door.

But second, the court underscored the gravity of the allegation “undue influence”, the key to many efforts to avoid enforcement of pre-marital and divorce agreements specifically, and to eschew responsibility for one’s own actions, more generally. The court aptly cited SJC precedent, in stating that:

    …a plaintiff must establish that the defendant overcame the will of the grantor …. [by]… some form of compulsion which coerces a person into doing something the person does not want to do.

And, in connection with Ms. Shea:

    …the undisputed evidence shows that [she] was in full command of her personal affairs and was neither ill, dependent nor enfeebled at the time of the transfer of real or personal property to Cameron.

Undue influence is a high bar, as well it should be.

 

Hoisted on Her Own a Fraudulent Petard, or There’s Just No Damn Honor Among Frauds Anymore: Shea v. Cameron – Part 1

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Levine Dispute Resolution - Alimony

It isn’t often that we get to see the phrase “joint stipulation of fraud”.

But, in the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s recent Shea v. Cameron, it is the perfect appetizer to a meal of mutual marital chicanery that resulted in the court’s decision to distance the itself from the:

    … “ingratitude, avarice, broken faith, brutal words, and heartless disregard of feelings of others,” which although blameworthy, are not legally compensable.

He lied about loving her. They married. He cheated. She filed for divorce. She withdrew her complaint. She filed a new complaint, this time for annulment. He snapped up that opportunity, only too happy to admit his faux amour.

Not so fast. After the parties presented their cooked-up annulment petition to the court, Ms. Shea served Mr. Cameron – on his way out of the courtroom, no less - with an complaint demanding a cookbook of damage remedies based on his “fraudulent inducement to marry”.

First, the Probate and Family Court, and then the Superior Court, kicked out Shea’s claims on summary judgment. But, the second judge “reported” the question to the Appeals Court, which took the matter up despite its procedural reservations. After a scholarly review of the history of various “heart balm” actions, the court wisely ended the matter for good, with unassailable logic:

  1. the law provides remedies for married persons when they break up, for equitable property division and support; and
  2. when the wife chose annulment instead of divorce, she gave up those remedies, since no marriage ever existed, a fiction of her own design.

Thus did Ms. Shea hoist herself, luring Mr. Cameron into admitting fraud, while plotting to then show him, but accidentally giving him a free pass, in the process.

There is just no honor in fraud anymore.

 



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

divorce and family law divorce mediation LDRC disputes divorce judgment divorced family law arbitrators Baseball Massachusetts lawyers Chouteau Levine private dispute resolution mediator arbitrator how baseball arbitration works resolve disputes Matrimonial Arbitration COLA divorce mediators General term alimony alimony lawyer SJC divorce lawyers Twinkies mediations Obamacare special master mediation Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony law Cohabitation family mediation Alimony Reform Act alimony statute annulment med/arb Major League Baseball Arbitration arbitrators health coverage lawyer-attended mediation family law arbitrator divorce arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act Baseball Arbitration divorce and family law mediators lawyers med-arb Child Support Guidelines DOMA mediators Divorce Agreements conciliation self-adjusting alimony divorce mediator alimony orders Same Sex Marriage divorce arbitrator Baseball Players child support MLB labor agreement alimony reform legislation traditional negotiations family and probate law disputes divorce process Massachusetts alimony and child support pre-ARA alimony fraud Levine Dispute Resolution Center medical benefits family law family support support orders health insurance dispute resolution divorce litigation divorce mediations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Divorce Massachusetts divorce agreement The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts alimony litigation separation Boston Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Defense of Marriage Act Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution facilitated negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators IRC §2704 family law mediation Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce arbitrators rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Family Law Arbitration arbitration high-risk methodology