781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Spousal Medical Insurance After Divorce: A Priority

Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Many, many years after Massachusetts’ (pre-Romney) groundbreaking effort to provide medical insurance for non-employee former spouses beyond the rights provided by the federal COBRA laws, we remain the most advanced state in this regard; but not without our own continuing uncertainties. In the most general terms, COBRA allows a divorced heterosexual person (don’t forget the Defense of Marriage Act: it is, regrettably, still national law) to buy continuing health coverage through the other spouse’s employer plan for a period of up to three years post-divorce only, at a cost of 102% of the cost of an individual plan member. Massachusetts, by contrast, offers an indefinite period of coverage at no cost beyond that required for the employee spouse to cover himself and children under a family plan without a fixed limitation of years; and when child coverage is no longer necessary, the non-employee may still have coverage on the family plan if the employee has not remarried, without a time limit. If the employee spouse marries another person, the former spouse may still be covered at the cost of an individual employee, by use of a rider. The non-employee spouse loses these rights whenever she remarries.

Yet, when the law was enacted, it had a loophole that has not, to this day, been closed:  self-insurance.  The law is an insurance statute and not a generic healthcare provision, so employers who choose not to buy an insurance product for their employees, but instead pay defined medical costs themselves, are exempt for the law, even if the hire an insurance company to provide administrative services to help run their internal plan.  It is likely that self-insurance employers become “insured” for the law’s purposes if they buy “stop loss” insurance (that is, if costs go above a certain amount, an insurance company steps in to cover the excess – think catastrophic coverage for the employer), but this information difficult to ascertain, uncertain and costly for the consumer to enforce.

There also remains a lack of clarity about what is a Massachusetts employer for purposes of the law. Many companies who do business here, but are based elsewhere, continue to contend that their obligations are covered by the (lack of) law to trump or augment COBRA in their home state. There is also uncertainty about what happens to the non-employee former spouse’s coverage if the employee changes jobs or moves out of state. To make matters more difficult, many company human resource departments appear, genuinely or not, to be hearing about our laws for the first time when counsel or client inquires.

For all of these reasons, it is a priority in any divorce action for the parties to gain and share the greatest level information possible about the employee spouse’s coverage, at the earliest time available in the divorce process. This information is all spelled out somewhere in paper or digital format; and if it is left to be treated as a last minute detail of divorce negotiation, or as one that is informed by casual representations only, disastrous and unanticipated consequences can occur. Sometimes, significant time must be invested in communicating with the employer about its state law obligations before they will be acknowledged and honored. In some cases, litigation, or the suggestion of same, may even be necessary.

As always, knowing is essential; and time is an ally.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts lawyers divorce process medical benefits alimony statute family and probate law disputes Matrimonial Arbitration fraud dispute resolution MLB labor agreement divorce lawyers high-risk methodology special master The Seven Sins of Alimony family law arbitrators SJC Family Law Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act divorce arbitrators Massachusetts divorce mediators lawyer Child Support Guidelines Twinkies mediations divorce and family law mediators divorce mediations child support Baseball Players alimony law Baseball Arbitration divorce mediation IRC §2704 family law arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Center med-arb facilitated negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC conciliation COLA Alimony Reform Act mediators divorce arbitration rehabilitative alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders resolve disputes General term alimony health insurance divorce arbitrator pre-ARA alimony Levine Dispute Resolution alimony reform legislation divorce judgment divorce and family law Cohabitation Massachusetts alimony arbitrators Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation litigation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Divorce mediation divorce mediator how baseball arbitration works family law mediator separation family mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly self-adjusting alimony med/arb Boston Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Massachusetts alimony and child support health coverage private dispute resolution divorced alimony family support arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act annulment Chouteau Levine traditional negotiations disputes Obamacare DOMA Baseball arbitration Same Sex Marriage support orders divorce litigation Divorce Agreements alimony orders divorce mediators LDRC Massachusetts lawyers divorce agreement family law mediation