781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

“Self-Modifying” Divorce Judgments: The Appeals Court Feels Strongly Both Ways. Hassey v. Hassey, Part One

Tuesday, August 05, 2014

In the recent case of Hassey v. Hassey, the Appeals Court reversed Judge Jeffrey A. Abber of the Essex Probate and Family Court, in part, for ordering alimony as a percentage of the husband’s ongoing income, rather than as a flat sum. They justices ruled that the judge had pre-decreed a modification of his own judgment based on facts and circumstances that had not yet changed. Thus, they reasoned, he deprived the husband of the right to resist such a change based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

This part of the decision was not surprising. The principle enunciated arises from long-standing precedent, with only 2 previous reported and relatively narrow appellate exceptions. Yet, curiously, the Appeals Court did not vacate that part of the judgment that determined that alimony shall terminate upon the wife’s cohabitation. Before the Alimony Reform Act of 2011 (eff. 3.1.12), this provision would have been absolutely contrary to law. Now, cohabitation is a statutorily recognized basis for change.

But the statute does not dictate the kind or extent of change. The law provides that if cohabitation occurs within the definition provided in the act, then the court shall do something. However, it requires the modifying judge to calibrate the remedy to the circumstances that exist at the time of the cohabitation. A judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony. So, when the Hassey judgment decreed that the wife’s cohabitation would automatically terminate alimony, the wife was denied the right, assured by the Alimony Reform Act, to resist termination based on the host of other material and substantial changes that might occur in the interim, in the context of a complaint for modification.

Did the wife fail to perfect this as an issue on appeal, relieving the court of an obligation to address it? We cannot know from the text of the decision. Without doubt, though, the decision is inconsistent, and the cause of consistency and predictability, its victim.

Next: Needs versus 30-35% in Section 53(b): In Its First Foray, Has the Appeals Court Legislated? Hassey v. Hassey, Part Two



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

IRC §2704 Massachusetts alimony Cohabitation alimony law lawyer divorce process special master family mediation divorce arbitration Baseball Arbitration lawyer-attended mediation arbitrators Massachusetts divorce lawyers separation divorce lawyers COLA lawyers Boston Twinkies divorced self-adjusting alimony health insurance LDRC MLB labor agreement Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Chouteau Levine litigation Massachusetts lawyers Matrimonial Arbitration Divorce Agreements medical benefits Family Law Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony how baseball arbitration works high-risk methodology divorce arbitrators mediations annulment alimony reform legislation alimony statute Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Uniform Arbitration Act divorce mediators family law arbitrators divorce judgment Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts Baseball Players Obamacare resolve disputes family law arbitrator med-arb divorce mediator pre-ARA alimony support orders mediation mediators divorce and family law mediators Divorce health coverage Baseball General term alimony Levine Dispute Resolution family law traditional negotiations family and probate law disputes Child Support Guidelines Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Same Sex Marriage divorce mediation dispute resolution DOMA disputes family support Alimony Reform Act Major League Baseball Arbitration Defense of Marriage Act facilitated negotiations divorce mediations Massachusetts alimony and child support arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center alimony orders conciliation rehabilitative alimony SJC divorce arbitrator divorce agreement divorce litigation arbitrator divorce and family law alimony mediator private dispute resolution fraud child support family law mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators med/arb