Divorce Mediation Blog

Same Sex Marriage after Obama-Romney

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

The 2012 elections are behind us, thank goodness.

We will remember them for the ebb and flow of the presidential confrontation between President Obama and Mitt Romney, and its attendant drama, both media-manufactured and real. But, in the long run, we wonder if the exercise in direct democracy that played out in the decisions of four states on the matter of marriage equality will outweigh the important consequences of the this election cycle at the “top of the ticket”.

After the Massachusetts landmark 2003 Supreme Judicial Court decision to permit same sex marriage, the acts of five other supreme courts or legislatures followed suit over time. Sometimes these actions were controversial. Interests opposed to the SJC’s action attempted to block the decision by legislative action here, before its May 2004 effective date. In Iowa, the voters purged its Supreme Court justices blamed for the legalization decision. When legislatures acted in New York, Vermont and Washington, D.C., the opposition reaction was more muted. After all, the action was legislative and not the result of “judicial activism”.

November 2012 was different. It was direct democracy in action. In these states, the populations led the leaders. In Maine, Washington State and Maryland, the voters seized the initiative and extended marriage affirmatively to gay and lesbian couples by referendum. Remarkable actions all, but standing alone, they might still be marginalized as coastal elitism. But Minnesota stands alone. For the first time, a state in the middle of the country, by statewide vote, declined to ban gay marriage, after years of other states doing exactly that.

“Suddenly”, twenty per cent of the states embrace marriage equity. Was all of this simply a product of blue states in a presidential turnout year being encouraged by Vice-President Biden’s “accidental” outing of the administration’s support of marriage equality – followed by the President’s public affirmance? Or was a cresting wave hitting the social fabric of the country? The answer may be “both of the above”, but if history is a guide, November 2012 will be remembered as the date that hastened the end of official discrimination against gays and lesbians.

With a plateful of economic and foreign policy crises, and maybe even some long overdue attention to our ongoing national gun/mental health negligence, it cannot be in the forefront, but can the end of federal discrimination, festering in Defense of Marriage Act, survive much longer? With the Supreme Court accepting one Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) challenge, and the marriage equity case from California, for review this term, we cannot know if the trend will be encouraged or slowed. But, in the end, the painful and gradual, but continuing trend of civic emancipation continues: and November 2012 will take a place of significance in that history.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce litigation Massachusetts lawyers IRC §2704 alimony health insurance arbitration Divorce Massachusetts divorce lawyers health coverage facilitated negotiations Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly lawyer-attended mediation mediations Massachusetts alimony and child support Cohabitation Alimony Reform Act mediator DOMA dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony support orders Baseball Players Same Sex Marriage family law arbitrators divorced private dispute resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony litigation family law arbitrator divorce mediations Family Law Arbitration Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts alimony Baseball annulment Twinkies special master divorce and family law mediators divorce mediation how baseball arbitration works divorce mediators medical benefits med/arb divorce agreement Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act alimony statute COLA resolve disputes divorce and family law lawyer child support alimony orders family law conciliation Defense of Marriage Act family support fraud arbitrator alimony law Boston LDRC Major League Baseball Arbitration family and probate law disputes divorce arbitrators Massachusetts divorce mediators Chouteau Levine Uniform Arbitration Act disputes Levine Dispute Resolutions MLB labor agreement Matrimonial Arbitration Baseball Arbitration self-adjusting alimony divorce lawyers family law mediation divorce judgment General term alimony alimony reform legislation divorce arbitrator SJC Obamacare rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts separation traditional negotiations mediation high-risk methodology mediators Self-adjusting alimony orders med-arb arbitrators divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center family mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC lawyers divorce arbitration divorce process Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolution