Divorce Mediation Blog

Rule 2704 Opposition - Talking Points

Wednesday, November 23, 2016

Recently, we blogged about the Internal Revenue Service proposed new section 2704 rules, which if enacted in their current form would create a new minimum value for businesses subject to intra-family transactions, and essentially eliminate discounts for marketability in that context.

Many in the business appraisal and estate planning communities are up in arms, and they mobilizing to defeat this IRS move, before it becomes entrenched.

While keeping an eye on unfolding commentary, we ran across “talking points” suggested by the American Society of Appraisers for use in opposing the new regulations. In summary they are:

  1. By increasing the value of fractional interests in family businesses, the new rules would result in an "stealth" tax increase of 25-50% in estate and gift taxes.
  2. By treating intra-family actors as "known parties", rather than hypothetical buyers and sellers, the rule would disregard the reality that a fractional interest is in fact, fractional, and not controlling, reducing its economic value.
  3. The notion that families will always work in concert has been rejected previously by the United States Supreme Court.
  4. The suggestion that intra-family transfers should be treated differently than those between unrelated parties is unsupported by any public reasoning advanced by the IRS.
  5. The proposed rule may put IRS regulations on a collision course with various state laws which recognize applicability of marketability discounts.
  6. This new approach will cause family-owned businesses to delay capital investment, and inhibit new hiring, as they preserve cash for pain increased taxes.

As divorce mediators and arbitrators, a former Probate judge, and litigators-in-recovery, we are used to this approach from Bernier, in the divorce context, but in estate and gift taxation?

What do you think?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Alimony Reform Act medical benefits Divorce Agreements divorce agreement family law arbitrator arbitrators Baseball Players med/arb private dispute resolution divorce lawyers arbitrator divorce arbitrator COLA divorce mediators Divorce LDRC Defense of Marriage Act Cohabitation family support divorce and family law DOMA Massachusetts alimony fraud mediation divorce mediation Obamacare alimony Massachusetts support orders Chouteau Levine separation The Seven Sins of Alimony divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Levine Dispute Resolutions Uniform Arbitration Act divorce and family law mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony statute divorce mediations special master lawyer Boston Child Support Guidelines divorce litigation family law mediation MLB labor agreement Same Sex Marriage Baseball resolve disputes Self-adjusting alimony orders family mediation how baseball arbitration works family and probate law disputes dispute resolution divorce arbitration pre-ARA alimony Twinkies Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly traditional negotiations lawyer-attended mediation alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolution Center rehabilitative alimony arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration divorce judgment health coverage conciliation divorced Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act mediators litigation facilitated negotiations General term alimony divorce process annulment alimony law Major League Baseball Arbitration disputes family law Family Law Arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support mediator SJC lawyers mediations high-risk methodology self-adjusting alimony child support family law arbitrators Massachusetts lawyers med-arb IRC §2704 alimony orders divorce arbitrators health insurance