Divorce Mediation Blog

Post-Divorce Health Insurance in Massachusetts: Time to Close the Self-Insurance Loophole?

Wednesday, June 05, 2013

Many years after Massachusetts created significant rights for divorcing families beyond the federal "COBRA" benefits for coverage of ex-spouses, an important loophole remains that undermines objectives of those statutes. In this entry, we will consider one of the exclusion of "self-insured" company medical plans from the scope of these enumerated rights.

In simple terms, our law states that medical insurers cannot exclude unmarried ex-spouses from an employee's family plan coverage post-divorce; and even if the employee-spouse remarries, the insurer must extend "rider" coverage to the unmarried former husband or wife. The insurance carrier may charge for rider coverage, but it may not surcharge. These benefits significantly exceed the so-called "COBRA” coverage provided by federal statute (36 months of maximum coverage at surcharged rates).

Yet, these benefits are not available to everyone with employment medical coverage in the Commonwealth. That is because these statutes do not apply to so-called “self-insured” medical plans (where the employer assumes the risks of employee medical costs, rather than an insurer), leaving their divorcing employees and their families to the lesser federal COBRA benefits. (Worse still, as we will discuss in a later entry, same sex divorcees have no protection at all, since they do not qualify for COBRA at this time.)

The reason for this unfortunate loophole is that these laws are insurance-based. They fall within the insurance statutes, regulating that industry; and the legislature did not extend these substantive family law rights beyond the insurance statutes. Further, what looks like an insurance plan may not be one. Self-insurers often hire insurance companies to serve as “administrators” of the plan, while the risk of loss remains the employer’s. Thus, while the employee may have what looks like an insurer’s coverage card, the law does not apply.

Meanwhile, since the 2006 Health Reform law here, the policy of the Commonwealth is that all residents have medical insurance. Next year, that will be effective federal law, too. The self-insured loophole is certainly inconsistent with these state and federal policies. Moreover, is it not unreasonable to disproportionately burden divorced persons who are unlucky enough to have a self-insured employer? Under current law, they can obtain private coverage, but it is routinely more expensive and/or less comprehensive than group employment coverage.

If the intent of the insurance laws and health coverage reform is to assist divided families, and to protect taxpayers from funding the insurable medical expenses of split dependents, is there any sustainable policy basis for maintaining this gap in the law? As divorce mediators, we grapple with the impact of the self-insured loophole.

Isn't a legislative fix long overdue?

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts alimony alimony statute divorce litigation divorce and family law resolve disputes mediations alimony law mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators Divorce Agreements Boston high-risk methodology Matrimonial Arbitration SJC family law mediation Cohabitation separation divorce agreement divorce judgment divorce mediator Self-adjusting alimony orders lawyer-attended mediation family and probate law disputes Massachusetts divorce process Baseball Players lawyers alternative dispute resolutions alimony LDRC med/arb disputes Massachusetts lawyers support orders Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth General term alimony DOMA family mediation COLA mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediators health coverage Chouteau Levine IRC §2704 med-arb Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Alimony Reform Act litigation Uniform Arbitration Act self-adjusting alimony divorce mediation pre-ARA alimony divorce arbitrators Child Support Guidelines Divorce Major League Baseball Arbitration arbitrators child support alimony reform legislation mediator divorce mediations facilitated negotiations Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act traditional negotiations divorce arbitration MLB labor agreement private dispute resolution family law arbitrators how baseball arbitration works rehabilitative alimony Twinkies arbitrator medical benefits Baseball arbitration Family Law Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Defense of Marriage Act lawyer divorce and family law mediators Levine Dispute Resolution conciliation special master divorce arbitrator family law family law arbitrator divorce lawyers divorced dispute resolution Baseball Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony laws Levine Dispute Resolution Center alimony orders Same Sex Marriage Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Obamacare health insurance family support