Divorce Mediation Blog

“Non-compete” Orders in Massachusetts Divorce: Yes they can!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

In recent case of Cesar v. Sundelin, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a Probate & Family Court judge has the power to order one spouse not to compete with the other spouse after a division of property that includes a business. This is new law here, though it had been addressed by a couple of other jurisdictions earlier.

The argument is: if a judge is going to force one person to buy out the interest of the other in a private business, what is the business owner buying if the other spouse can walk across the street (figuratively or literally), set up shop and compete for the same customers? The counter argument is: if the spouse who is being bought out made a living doing the same or similar work, how can that spouse be prevented from making a living, or without being compensated for the loss of an ability to make one?

This ruling is important for at least three reasons. First, it broadens the powers of Probate & Family Court judges to do something that at least one judge thought he could not do (in Cesar the trial judge had refused to enter a non-compete because he thought he lacked that power – and one suspects that others agreed); and it raises questions about how this should factor in to valuation questions, and with regard to alimony based on the “needs” of the spouse who is restrained from competing. Arguably, this issue is limited to cases in which the spouse shared a business activity, but that makes the alimony question more acute.

Should judges have this breadth of power in divorce cases? The Appeals Court thought so, when it is necessary to protect the integrity of the property division order. We will all see how this plays out, over time.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Massachusetts alimony health insurance family and probate law disputes divorce mediator divorce and family law mediators Levine Dispute Resolutions resolve disputes family support conciliation divorced Levine Dispute Resolution fraud Baseball divorce agreement med/arb Same Sex Marriage arbitrators divorce arbitrators Divorce mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Child Support Guidelines mediations Chouteau Levine alimony reform legislation family law arbitrator rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support Divorce Agreements Uniform Arbitration Act divorce litigation Major League Baseball Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders Alimony Reform Act high-risk methodology Defense of Marriage Act special master facilitated negotiations alimony law Massachusetts lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Matrimonial Arbitration divorce process family mediation separation Twinkies General term alimony family law mediation alimony orders divorce arbitration lawyers medical benefits divorce lawyers alimony statute support orders traditional negotiations Massachusetts litigation disputes mediators private dispute resolution COLA arbitrator DOMA lawyer self-adjusting alimony divorce judgment Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce mediations health coverage annulment MLB labor agreement LDRC pre-ARA alimony Family Law Arbitration The Seven Sins of Alimony child support how baseball arbitration works SJC Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly dispute resolution family law divorce mediators mediator divorce and family law Baseball Players med-arb family law arbitrators lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts divorce lawyers arbitration Cohabitation Boston IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolution Center alimony divorce mediation Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrator Obamacare