Divorce Mediation Blog

“Non-compete” Orders in Massachusetts Divorce: Yes they can!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

In recent case of Cesar v. Sundelin, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a Probate & Family Court judge has the power to order one spouse not to compete with the other spouse after a division of property that includes a business. This is new law here, though it had been addressed by a couple of other jurisdictions earlier.

The argument is: if a judge is going to force one person to buy out the interest of the other in a private business, what is the business owner buying if the other spouse can walk across the street (figuratively or literally), set up shop and compete for the same customers? The counter argument is: if the spouse who is being bought out made a living doing the same or similar work, how can that spouse be prevented from making a living, or without being compensated for the loss of an ability to make one?

This ruling is important for at least three reasons. First, it broadens the powers of Probate & Family Court judges to do something that at least one judge thought he could not do (in Cesar the trial judge had refused to enter a non-compete because he thought he lacked that power – and one suspects that others agreed); and it raises questions about how this should factor in to valuation questions, and with regard to alimony based on the “needs” of the spouse who is restrained from competing. Arguably, this issue is limited to cases in which the spouse shared a business activity, but that makes the alimony question more acute.

Should judges have this breadth of power in divorce cases? The Appeals Court thought so, when it is necessary to protect the integrity of the property division order. We will all see how this plays out, over time.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Self-adjusting alimony orders Boston Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce lawyers child support facilitated negotiations Levine Dispute Resolutions dispute resolution divorce mediator Defense of Marriage Act divorce and family law mediators lawyers rehabilitative alimony divorce arbitrator fraud family law arbitrators divorced The Seven Sins of Alimony med/arb divorce arbitrators General term alimony family and probate law disputes MLB labor agreement COLA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Levine Dispute Resolution high-risk methodology med-arb Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce and family law divorce judgment pre-ARA alimony Divorce Agreements special master lawyer medical benefits Baseball alimony statute disputes mediators LDRC IRC §2704 Massachusetts divorce process Baseball Arbitration health insurance Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth alimony family mediation annulment Baseball Players SJC alimony reform legislation Matrimonial Arbitration family law mediation Levine Dispute Resolution Center Massachusetts lawyers divorce litigation Cohabitation Child Support Guidelines alimony orders Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act resolve disputes health coverage divorce agreement Divorce mediations arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Twinkies arbitrator Obamacare Same Sex Marriage Family Law Arbitration self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony alimony law family law divorce mediations family law arbitrator divorce mediators support orders DOMA Chouteau Levine private dispute resolution arbitrators traditional negotiations Alimony Reform Act divorce mediation family support how baseball arbitration works divorce arbitration separation lawyer-attended mediation conciliation mediation litigation