Divorce Mediation Blog

“Non-compete” Orders in Massachusetts Divorce: Yes they can!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

In recent case of Cesar v. Sundelin, the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a Probate & Family Court judge has the power to order one spouse not to compete with the other spouse after a division of property that includes a business. This is new law here, though it had been addressed by a couple of other jurisdictions earlier.

The argument is: if a judge is going to force one person to buy out the interest of the other in a private business, what is the business owner buying if the other spouse can walk across the street (figuratively or literally), set up shop and compete for the same customers? The counter argument is: if the spouse who is being bought out made a living doing the same or similar work, how can that spouse be prevented from making a living, or without being compensated for the loss of an ability to make one?

This ruling is important for at least three reasons. First, it broadens the powers of Probate & Family Court judges to do something that at least one judge thought he could not do (in Cesar the trial judge had refused to enter a non-compete because he thought he lacked that power – and one suspects that others agreed); and it raises questions about how this should factor in to valuation questions, and with regard to alimony based on the “needs” of the spouse who is restrained from competing. Arguably, this issue is limited to cases in which the spouse shared a business activity, but that makes the alimony question more acute.

Should judges have this breadth of power in divorce cases? The Appeals Court thought so, when it is necessary to protect the integrity of the property division order. We will all see how this plays out, over time.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alimony orders mediation child support divorce process divorce mediators disputes conciliation Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitration alimony statute family law arbitrators litigation Alimony Reform Act COLA family law arbitrators Massachusetts alimony and child support rehabilitative alimony resolve disputes family law arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolutions Self-adjusting alimony orders lawyer-attended mediation divorce mediator Baseball Players Same Sex Marriage Matrimonial Arbitration arbitration family mediation high-risk methodology divorce litigation divorce mediations pre-ARA alimony arbitrator Divorce dispute resolution health coverage family support Boston medical benefits Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce and family law mediators Baseball how baseball arbitration works Uniform Arbitration Act SJC mediators Cohabitation Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony law DOMA Massachusetts alimony family and probate law disputes Twinkies self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce lawyers Chouteau Levine divorce arbitrators med/arb health insurance Massachusetts Massachusetts divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth IRC §2704 Child Support Guidelines support orders Divorce Agreements alimony laws special master mediations separation LDRC divorced family law mediation med-arb divorce arbitrator alimony lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution divorce agreement alimony reform legislation facilitated negotiations divorce and family law General term alimony private dispute resolution traditional negotiations divorce mediation Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act MLB labor agreement Family Law Arbitration lawyer mediator divorce judgment Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony alternative dispute resolutions Obamacare Defense of Marriage Act