Divorce Mediation Blog

Musing on Massachusetts Alimony: Do "Needs" Still Matter for the “One Percent”?

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

The year-plus-old Massachusetts alimony "reform" statute provides that the court may not include the capital gains, interest and dividend income which derive from property received in divorce equitable asset division in the consideration of alimony rights and obligations. This is of little consequence -- and makes sense -- in most cases, where neither party can reasonably expect to collect income on assets that is enough to affect self-support; especially in a half per cent bank interest environment; and where few people have a critical mass of investable assets to chase stock market returns that would impact the ability to meet current needs.

But, what about cases in which high net worth parties divide large productive estates? In some families, investment returns can meet all reasonable needs, or even both parties’ actual expenses. Before March 1, 2012, this fact alone might have trumped an alimony claim because "need" was a longstanding pillar of alimony law. Even then, need was an elastic term as interpreted by appellate courts, encompassing the specific standard of living of the parties during the marriage. Judges had very broad discretion, to award alimony where the overall equities justified it, or to decline because need was not evident.

While the definition of alimony in the new law expressly includes need, the exclusion of investment income may have the effect of changing that for the “one per cent”.

Consider an extreme set of facts: the parties divide $100 million arising from entrepreneurial success, and the 45 year-old business spouse, out of a job after sale, chooses to take a job with a non-profit employer that pays a salary. A literal reading of the alimony statute would demand that the employee "generally" pay not more than the other spouse’s need, or 30-35% of the difference between the parties' respective gross incomes, but excluding that income produced by their divided assets. In other words, alimony seems mandatory even where no need exists.

If this reading is correct, we suppose that a judge could award $1 of annual alimony and fulfill the statute's mandate, but is that the legislature's intent? As divorce mediators, we look at the economics of every case carefully, but informed clients will know about the law; and we wonder the long-term implications of this statutory provision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


alimony laws Massachusetts divorce mediators child support Divorce family support arbitrator mediation litigation alimony reform legislation Same Sex Marriage facilitated negotiations Defense of Marriage Act Divorce Agreements high-risk methodology SJC divorce agreement divorce process divorce mediators private dispute resolution divorced Obamacare Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC med/arb General term alimony resolve disputes how baseball arbitration works divorce arbitration alimony orders alimony statute Baseball Baseball Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act mediations medical benefits divorce mediator IRC §2704 divorce litigation family law mediation family law divorce and family law mediators disputes Alimony Reform Act lawyer-attended mediation self-adjusting alimony health coverage dispute resolution divorce and family law divorce arbitrators alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony MLB labor agreement LDRC pre-ARA alimony health insurance divorce judgment conciliation COLA Baseball Players support orders family law arbitrators divorce mediations special master Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Levine Dispute Resolutions Massachusetts lawyers mediators Boston Family Law Arbitration Child Support Guidelines lawyer family and probate law disputes divorce lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders alternative dispute resolutions Twinkies divorce arbitrator family mediation mediator med-arb Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Chouteau Levine Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitration alimony law Massachusetts alimony and child support Cohabitation traditional negotiations lawyers separation DOMA arbitrators family law arbitrator divorce mediation rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts alimony Matrimonial Arbitration Major League Baseball Arbitration