Divorce Mediation Blog

Musing on Massachusetts Alimony: Do "Needs" Still Matter for the “One Percent”?

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

The year-plus-old Massachusetts alimony "reform" statute provides that the court may not include the capital gains, interest and dividend income which derive from property received in divorce equitable asset division in the consideration of alimony rights and obligations. This is of little consequence -- and makes sense -- in most cases, where neither party can reasonably expect to collect income on assets that is enough to affect self-support; especially in a half per cent bank interest environment; and where few people have a critical mass of investable assets to chase stock market returns that would impact the ability to meet current needs.

But, what about cases in which high net worth parties divide large productive estates? In some families, investment returns can meet all reasonable needs, or even both parties’ actual expenses. Before March 1, 2012, this fact alone might have trumped an alimony claim because "need" was a longstanding pillar of alimony law. Even then, need was an elastic term as interpreted by appellate courts, encompassing the specific standard of living of the parties during the marriage. Judges had very broad discretion, to award alimony where the overall equities justified it, or to decline because need was not evident.

While the definition of alimony in the new law expressly includes need, the exclusion of investment income may have the effect of changing that for the “one per cent”.

Consider an extreme set of facts: the parties divide $100 million arising from entrepreneurial success, and the 45 year-old business spouse, out of a job after sale, chooses to take a job with a non-profit employer that pays a salary. A literal reading of the alimony statute would demand that the employee "generally" pay not more than the other spouse’s need, or 30-35% of the difference between the parties' respective gross incomes, but excluding that income produced by their divided assets. In other words, alimony seems mandatory even where no need exists.

If this reading is correct, we suppose that a judge could award $1 of annual alimony and fulfill the statute's mandate, but is that the legislature's intent? As divorce mediators, we look at the economics of every case carefully, but informed clients will know about the law; and we wonder the long-term implications of this statutory provision.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


facilitated negotiations divorce litigation Divorce Agreements Family Law Arbitration IRC §2704 Massachusetts divorce mediators health insurance high-risk methodology divorce mediation divorce lawyers family mediation mediations alimony statute Uniform Arbitration Act SJC family and probate law disputes Divorce Twinkies arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce agreement Child Support Guidelines COLA Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Major League Baseball Arbitration Baseball MLB labor agreement LDRC General term alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support private dispute resolution traditional negotiations divorce mediator med/arb Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediators divorce judgment mediation family law arbitrators lawyers Alimony Reform Act family law child support Massachusetts alimony Chouteau Levine how baseball arbitration works lawyer-attended mediation conciliation alimony reform legislation disputes litigation DOMA Levine Dispute Resolution divorce and family law arbitration divorce and family law mediators Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly health coverage resolve disputes alimony divorce mediations arbitrators dispute resolution Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family support Same Sex Marriage Boston Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC medical benefits support orders Levine Dispute Resolutions The Seven Sins of Alimony self-adjusting alimony separation annulment divorced rehabilitative alimony family law mediation fraud Massachusetts lawyers Defense of Marriage Act mediator Cohabitation pre-ARA alimony divorce process divorce arbitrator Matrimonial Arbitration Obamacare Baseball Players Massachusetts divorce mediators lawyer med-arb divorce arbitration alimony orders alimony law family law arbitrator divorce arbitrators special master