Divorce Mediation Blog

Masters and the Probate & Family Courts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

The Probate and Family Court appoint two kinds of “masters”. A master is a lawyer who holds hearings as an extension of the Court itself. One kind is a “discovery master”. The other is a “master, facts final”.

A discovery master aids the Court’s case management by helping the attorneys negotiate, and if necessary by deciding disputes over the exchange of information, known as discovery, in the litigation process. Each side may challenge the discovery master’s decision to the appointing judge, but they rarely do so. This is because the lawyers generally feel that the master process was fair and that a judge will likely address the issue in the same or a similar fashion as the master.

A master, facts final, hears some or all of the contested case, and makes a recommended judgment. The process follows the same rules as in court, unless the parties agree otherwise. One or both parties ask the Court to “confirm” the master’s recommended judgment. If one party disagrees, he or she retains the right to oppose the entry of the master’s decision and a court judgment. The Court retains the right to accept or reject the master’s recommendation in whole or in part.

Where parties cannot settle their matter by direct negotiation, by mediation or otherwise, the use of either kind of master is a way in which they can maximize control over their case, by selecting their own master, and by pursuing what is a mostly private proceeding that most often results in the agreed entry of judgment based thereon.

With our courts in crisis, this avenue is being followed more and more. Most every judge is happy to approve a selected master and to stand by for the master’s result. When faced with long delays and abounding uncertainties in the public trial process, due consideration should be given to the use of a master for all or part of a contested case.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorced lawyers family mediation Uniform Arbitration Act special master divorce and family law mediators Self-adjusting alimony orders Same Sex Marriage facilitated negotiations Child Support Guidelines Massachusetts alimony and child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediators divorce mediator divorce agreement divorce litigation alimony law Massachusetts lawyers arbitrator mediator family and probate law disputes Baseball Arbitration Divorce alimony orders DOMA med/arb Alimony Reform Act IRC §2704 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts arbitration divorce judgment Massachusetts divorce lawyers dispute resolution Boston separation divorce mediation Baseball Levine Dispute Resolution health coverage alimony reform legislation traditional negotiations arbitrators divorce arbitration child support Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act how baseball arbitration works MLB labor agreement LDRC divorce arbitrators litigation Obamacare The Seven Sins of Alimony resolve disputes alimony statute annulment COLA lawyer-attended mediation private dispute resolution Defense of Marriage Act conciliation family law arbitrators Massachusetts alimony Chouteau Levine family law Massachusetts divorce mediators disputes divorce lawyers divorce mediators Family Law Arbitration self-adjusting alimony divorce mediations mediations fraud mediation alimony divorce process family support lawyer Baseball Players Cohabitation divorce arbitrator support orders high-risk methodology pre-ARA alimony family law arbitrator family law mediation medical benefits SJC Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce and family law Twinkies rehabilitative alimony med-arb health insurance Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolutions Matrimonial Arbitration General term alimony