Divorce Mediation Blog

Making A Bad Situation Worse: Rosenwassser v. Rosenwasser

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

In Rosenwasser v. Rosenwasser Massachusetts Appeals Court recently faulted a trial judge for denying a father’s request to “remove” his daughter to the State of Florida, dissecting her application of the facts to the two-pronged “real advantage” test that governs such requests by primary custodial parents, with painstaking care and convincing detail. Piling one critical point on another, the opinion yielded two inevitable conclusions: that the trial court ineffectively weighed and explained the advantages for the father in his requested move; and she over-weighted the hope that the mother’s recent efforts to kindle a relationship with the child would result in a benefit for the child. All signs pointed plainly to reversal.

Then, without explanation, but inexplicably calling it a “close call”, the Appeals Court remanded the case for more trial court hearings, more written findings, very probably another appeal; deferring any final decision and prolonging the agony for another family in limbo. A really fine decision turned bad: a victim of appellate irresoluteness.

Too often, as we learn again, litigation is a futile exercise in matters involving children.

Here’s why. The child was in utero when the parties separated in 2010. Shortly after the divorce, the mother became unavailable for mental health reasons. By 2012 a partial modification judgment formalized the father’s assumption of exclusive care for the child, a fact on the ground since shortly after her birth. For two of the child’s first three years, her mother was an infrequent presence in her life.

In August 2012, the father sought permission to move, for very strong reasons under the law. Trial did not begin until a year later and concluded five months after that. The trial court’s new judgment entered in July 2014. The husband’s appeal absorbed another 24 months, resulting in the Appeals Court opinion on June 17, 2016.

Just since the father filed his request to move child has aged from two to six years, fully two-thirds of her young life. With the Appeals Court’s tepid remedy, the clock continues to run, and it is fair to predict that this case will continue into 2017 and perhaps well beyond. The facts on the ground change daily, as the system grinds on, blind to the stress that this process imposes on a young child, whose road is difficult enough.

One bedrock principle that appellate law imposes on the trial court is that a judgment must logically flow from the facts found in the case. We wish that the Appeals Court applied this standard to itself.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


conciliation support orders divorce and family law mediators lawyer-attended mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony private dispute resolution divorce arbitration health insurance Obamacare mediation annulment COLA how baseball arbitration works medical benefits Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony and child support Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce agreement divorce judgment Cohabitation divorce and family law divorce arbitrators LDRC pre-ARA alimony arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family law arbitrators divorced Massachusetts alimony reform legislation Twinkies arbitration alimony MLB labor agreement Uniform Arbitration Act facilitated negotiations self-adjusting alimony rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly IRC §2704 mediators fraud lawyers Divorce Agreements Divorce Child Support Guidelines dispute resolution Chouteau Levine alimony statute alimony orders family law arbitrator mediations alimony law family support SJC Boston disputes resolve disputes separation Levine Dispute Resolution Center DOMA special master arbitrator traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators Matrimonial Arbitration General term alimony Family Law Arbitration divorce litigation med-arb family mediation mediator divorce mediators Baseball family law mediation Baseball Arbitration divorce mediation Defense of Marriage Act Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce process high-risk methodology divorce mediations lawyer health coverage Same Sex Marriage Levine Dispute Resolution Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC divorce lawyers divorce arbitrator child support Massachusetts alimony family and probate law disputes Baseball Players med/arb family law Levine Dispute Resolutions litigation Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediator Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth