Divorce Mediation Blog

Litigation Attorneys and Mediation

Monday, November 12, 2012

As our practice develops, more of it seems devoted to lawyer-attended mediations, arbitrations and hybrids. When clients come to us with their counsel it is most often after the parties have experienced some litigation, and its attendant costs, delays and confrontations. They are either in the phase where the case has been pre-tried by the court and sits in the long queue for trial; or before the pre-trial conference itself. Occasionally, the case is in an earlier stage.

Why would litigation attorneys encourage or participate in mediation at any of these stages of litigation? It might seem to run counter to their own economic interest, and it involves relaxing some measure of control, something lawyers are loath to do. One reason is that some clients insist upon it, having heard from others that it may be an effective way of shortening what feels like an interminable process. Another is the wear and tear that increasing costs and the lack of any assured containment within the public court process imposes on lawyers and clients alike.

But, we find that the most common reason is that every week, more lawyers are realizing that it works! The lawyers themselves realize that they do retain a good measure of influence in this process. They see and experience that the mediation is fairly run; that everyone has their “say”; and, that in the end, no one is forced to do anything. Counsel also realizes that it is better to be paid fully for a process that bring early closure, than to run up an often uncollectible bill from a client after a long trial. Clients in the end are happier, and thus, more inclined to refer new clients to the mediation-friendly lawyer.

Mediators who do not welcome litigation counsel are cutting off a valuable source of business. Lawyers who refuse to mediate are short-selling their clients. The meeting of the two is good for all, especially the clients.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts lawyers dispute resolution MLB labor agreement Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony Twinkies self-adjusting alimony how baseball arbitration works mediations Massachusetts alimony and child support Child Support Guidelines divorce arbitration support orders divorce mediation divorce agreement family mediation family law arbitrator divorce arbitrator alternative dispute resolutions Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act special master conciliation mediators alimony law DOMA traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolutions family support divorce and family law Baseball facilitated negotiations family law arbitrators divorce litigation divorce lawyers disputes LDRC Family Law Arbitration alimony reform legislation arbitrator COLA Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Boston Cohabitation litigation alimony laws family law Massachusetts resolve disputes alimony statute Obamacare Defense of Marriage Act divorce mediator SJC child support med/arb lawyers divorce mediations separation Levine Dispute Resolution Divorce Agreements health insurance health coverage arbitration Same Sex Marriage IRC §2704 private dispute resolution pre-ARA alimony divorced mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony Uniform Arbitration Act divorce judgment Chouteau Levine alimony orders lawyer med-arb lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Matrimonial Arbitration family law mediation General term alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration Alimony Reform Act divorce process Baseball Players divorce and family law mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth rehabilitative alimony Divorce divorce arbitrators high-risk methodology arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center mediator Massachusetts divorce mediators medical benefits divorce mediators family and probate law disputes