Divorce Mediation Blog

Litigation Attorneys and Mediation

Monday, November 12, 2012

As our practice develops, more of it seems devoted to lawyer-attended mediations, arbitrations and hybrids. When clients come to us with their counsel it is most often after the parties have experienced some litigation, and its attendant costs, delays and confrontations. They are either in the phase where the case has been pre-tried by the court and sits in the long queue for trial; or before the pre-trial conference itself. Occasionally, the case is in an earlier stage.

Why would litigation attorneys encourage or participate in mediation at any of these stages of litigation? It might seem to run counter to their own economic interest, and it involves relaxing some measure of control, something lawyers are loath to do. One reason is that some clients insist upon it, having heard from others that it may be an effective way of shortening what feels like an interminable process. Another is the wear and tear that increasing costs and the lack of any assured containment within the public court process imposes on lawyers and clients alike.

But, we find that the most common reason is that every week, more lawyers are realizing that it works! The lawyers themselves realize that they do retain a good measure of influence in this process. They see and experience that the mediation is fairly run; that everyone has their “say”; and, that in the end, no one is forced to do anything. Counsel also realizes that it is better to be paid fully for a process that bring early closure, than to run up an often uncollectible bill from a client after a long trial. Clients in the end are happier, and thus, more inclined to refer new clients to the mediation-friendly lawyer.

Mediators who do not welcome litigation counsel are cutting off a valuable source of business. Lawyers who refuse to mediate are short-selling their clients. The meeting of the two is good for all, especially the clients.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


resolve disputes divorced medical benefits arbitrator Levine Dispute Resolution Center lawyer-attended mediation Twinkies Levine Dispute Resolutions annulment arbitration health insurance family law arbitrators Massachusetts mediations lawyer facilitated negotiations COLA divorce arbitrator med-arb divorce and family law conciliation divorce and family law mediators dispute resolution disputes alimony statute divorce process Cohabitation Defense of Marriage Act alimony reform legislation family law mediation alimony law Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts alimony and child support SJC divorce lawyers Obamacare how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly LDRC Same Sex Marriage DOMA Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders family law high-risk methodology Divorce traditional negotiations Family Law Arbitration IRC §2704 Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC litigation support orders Massachusetts lawyers Chouteau Levine Boston Levine Dispute Resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act pre-ARA alimony Baseball Players fraud MLB labor agreement divorce arbitrators special master family support divorce judgment Child Support Guidelines Divorce Agreements divorce litigation divorce mediations arbitrators mediation divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth General term alimony Baseball Arbitration lawyers Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce agreement private dispute resolution Massachusetts divorce mediators family mediation Matrimonial Arbitration health coverage med/arb divorce arbitration rehabilitative alimony family law arbitrator divorce mediation Baseball self-adjusting alimony mediators alimony divorce mediator separation child support alimony orders family and probate law disputes mediator