Divorce Mediation Blog

Litigation Attorneys and Mediation

Monday, November 12, 2012

As our practice develops, more of it seems devoted to lawyer-attended mediations, arbitrations and hybrids. When clients come to us with their counsel it is most often after the parties have experienced some litigation, and its attendant costs, delays and confrontations. They are either in the phase where the case has been pre-tried by the court and sits in the long queue for trial; or before the pre-trial conference itself. Occasionally, the case is in an earlier stage.

Why would litigation attorneys encourage or participate in mediation at any of these stages of litigation? It might seem to run counter to their own economic interest, and it involves relaxing some measure of control, something lawyers are loath to do. One reason is that some clients insist upon it, having heard from others that it may be an effective way of shortening what feels like an interminable process. Another is the wear and tear that increasing costs and the lack of any assured containment within the public court process imposes on lawyers and clients alike.

But, we find that the most common reason is that every week, more lawyers are realizing that it works! The lawyers themselves realize that they do retain a good measure of influence in this process. They see and experience that the mediation is fairly run; that everyone has their “say”; and, that in the end, no one is forced to do anything. Counsel also realizes that it is better to be paid fully for a process that bring early closure, than to run up an often uncollectible bill from a client after a long trial. Clients in the end are happier, and thus, more inclined to refer new clients to the mediation-friendly lawyer.

Mediators who do not welcome litigation counsel are cutting off a valuable source of business. Lawyers who refuse to mediate are short-selling their clients. The meeting of the two is good for all, especially the clients.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


separation resolve disputes mediators family law mediation mediator Child Support Guidelines alimony statute mediations lawyers divorce judgment Major League Baseball Arbitration health coverage conciliation divorce arbitrator Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce process Divorce Agreements Self-adjusting alimony orders support orders lawyer-attended mediation Baseball Arbitration divorced med-arb Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce and family law Massachusetts divorce arbitration Massachusetts alimony med/arb alimony divorce mediator IRC §2704 divorce lawyers child support pre-ARA alimony family support COLA litigation Obamacare divorce and family law mediators Levine Dispute Resolution SJC family and probate law disputes Massachusetts divorce lawyers divorce mediations medical benefits divorce litigation Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly traditional negotiations arbitrators Family Law Arbitration family law arbitrators mediation LDRC health insurance divorce arbitrators The Seven Sins of Alimony Baseball Massachusetts divorce mediators self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support Boston fraud disputes arbitration annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC how baseball arbitration works divorce mediation family law arbitrator family law alimony orders private dispute resolution Baseball Players Alimony Reform Act General term alimony alimony reform legislation Divorce special master Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony law divorce mediators facilitated negotiations divorce agreement family mediation high-risk methodology lawyer rehabilitative alimony arbitrator Defense of Marriage Act Matrimonial Arbitration Chouteau Levine Same Sex Marriage MLB labor agreement dispute resolution Massachusetts lawyers DOMA Twinkies Cohabitation