Divorce Mediation Blog

Lawyers Weekly Takes On Rule 1:28: We Agree

Wednesday, November 04, 2015

We have commented here, on a number of occasions, about the Appeals Court's use and misuse of Rule 1:28's so-called "unpublished" opinions.

They are informal, scant on facts and often reasoning, sometimes obscure and too-often just confusing to family law discourse. If the Appeals Court is not going to stand behind its cases as precedent, or if an opinion is truly for the sole benefit of the captioned parties, the public record would be better served by a simple "affirmed" or "reversed" notation. As public records, the "full" opinions would be available to the highly motivated, but the cases would not be citable from the current netherworld of "persuasive but not precedent", to which the Appeals Court has assigned them.

For that reason, we delighted in reading October 26th's Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, wherein the Editorial Board opined, at p. 38, that newly minted Chief Justice Scott L. Kafker should pay "immediate attention" to the problem of Rule 1:28. Lawyers Weekly described the intent of the rule to address "straightforward cases" and that the Appeals Court overuses the rule to the public's detriment. While our critique goes further, the editorial's targeting of the issue is welcome; and we thank the board for its call to action.

Either way: elevate all opinions to the level of precedent, then analyze and write them accordingly; or reduce them to simple announcements of the action taken on appeal. We respect the burden that the Appeals Court's unchecked, non-discretionary caseload poses. But do something please, Chief Justice Kafker, about this unhelpful practice.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


dispute resolution high-risk methodology family support Twinkies lawyer-attended mediation divorce process General term alimony LDRC Defense of Marriage Act Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce and family law arbitrators fraud traditional negotiations Obamacare Divorce divorce judgment health coverage Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorced Chouteau Levine Levine Dispute Resolutions resolve disputes Baseball Players Uniform Arbitration Act family and probate law disputes MLB labor agreement family law arbitrator Boston alimony law self-adjusting alimony divorce mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Major League Baseball Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution Center lawyer support orders private dispute resolution arbitrator disputes family law medical benefits divorce lawyers Child Support Guidelines family law mediation rehabilitative alimony annulment mediations mediators The Seven Sins of Alimony med-arb IRC §2704 child support Massachusetts Family Law Arbitration special master family mediation divorce mediation alimony orders how baseball arbitration works pre-ARA alimony Baseball conciliation facilitated negotiations Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts alimony alimony statute COLA divorce mediations Massachusetts lawyers mediator divorce mediators DOMA Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly med/arb Same Sex Marriage divorce litigation arbitration divorce agreement Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC alimony reform legislation Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitrator alimony mediation Cohabitation Divorce Agreements health insurance divorce and family law mediators Baseball Arbitration SJC family law arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration divorce arbitration divorce arbitrators litigation lawyers Alimony Reform Act separation