Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


family and probate law disputes dispute resolution General term alimony Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts pre-ARA alimony Twinkies Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act mediation Family Law Arbitration Cohabitation divorce mediator divorce arbitration health coverage conciliation mediations disputes DOMA alimony law Massachusetts divorce mediators med-arb Uniform Arbitration Act Self-adjusting alimony orders Massachusetts divorce lawyers family support divorced alimony fraud Boston rehabilitative alimony lawyer-attended mediation separation traditional negotiations Divorce Agreements Child Support Guidelines SJC family mediation support orders The Seven Sins of Alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration lawyer Levine Dispute Resolution Center divorce mediators litigation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly health insurance COLA family law alimony orders arbitrators arbitration facilitated negotiations med/arb Massachusetts alimony and child support IRC §2704 alimony statute divorce process self-adjusting alimony Obamacare Massachusetts lawyers lawyers Levine Dispute Resolutions arbitrator LDRC Divorce family law mediation Baseball Arbitration divorce lawyers divorce litigation Baseball Players Levine Dispute Resolution family law arbitrator divorce mediations high-risk methodology alimony reform legislation divorce judgment family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC resolve disputes divorce mediation mediators private dispute resolution Chouteau Levine divorce arbitrator divorce arbitrators medical benefits mediator MLB labor agreement Same Sex Marriage divorce agreement how baseball arbitration works divorce and family law mediators child support Alimony Reform Act Matrimonial Arbitration Defense of Marriage Act annulment Baseball divorce and family law special master