Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce agreement Massachusetts lawyers lawyer divorce judgment Baseball Players Baseball Arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration Uniform Arbitration Act Levine Dispute Resolutions separation arbitrator rehabilitative alimony divorce arbitrator Child Support Guidelines Defense of Marriage Act family law arbitrators Massachusetts alimony arbitrators Twinkies alimony law Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act child support Boston mediators Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediations alimony orders Baseball COLA Massachusetts alimony and child support alimony statute DOMA divorced divorce litigation mediator family law arbitrator facilitated negotiations Divorce medical benefits pre-ARA alimony Chouteau Levine alimony lawyer-attended mediation Family Law Arbitration divorce process divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution mediation private dispute resolution self-adjusting alimony support orders alimony reform legislation annulment med-arb divorce mediators arbitration Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth resolve disputes divorce arbitration divorce and family law mediators Cohabitation General term alimony litigation Massachusetts divorce mediators Major League Baseball Arbitration Same Sex Marriage family mediation med/arb LDRC family law Alimony Reform Act Massachusetts lawyers health insurance conciliation family law mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly disputes Levine Dispute Resolution Center health coverage IRC §2704 dispute resolution The Seven Sins of Alimony family and probate law disputes special master SJC MLB labor agreement divorce mediation divorce mediator divorce and family law mediations family support Obamacare Divorce Agreements traditional negotiations Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC high-risk methodology divorce arbitrators fraud how baseball arbitration works