Divorce Mediation Blog

Health Insurance In Section 34 And Alimony Reform - Part 2

Sunday, February 16, 2014

In the last blog entry, we introduced this topic and explored the first sentence of the health insurance portion of MGL, chapter 208, section 34, which we set forth in its entirety. It is apparent that a trial judge must make inquiry into spousal health insurance coverage that is available to an alimony payor . On close reading, it is difficult to understand exactly what the meets and bounds of that inquiry are, but plainly it places a priority on providing coverage. This is unsurprising in the current era of health care reform, despite the fact that the section 34 language preceded both the state and federal the individual mandates.

Here, we consider section 34’s relationship to MGL, chapter 208, sections 53 (eff. 3/1/12), which it also preceded. To do so, we take on the third sentence of section 34’s health insurance provision. It says:

    In no event shall the order for alimony be reduced as a result of the obligor’s cost for health insurance coverage for the spouse.

And, it remains good law. Yet, the new alimony law, states that:

    (e) In setting an initial alimony order, or in modifying an existing order, the court may deviate from duration and amount limits for general term alimony and rehabilitative alimony upon written findings that deviation is necessary. Grounds for deviation may include: …
    (3)whether the payor spouse is providing health insurance and the cost of health insurance for the recipient spouse…

So, which law prevails? The one that says that alimony cannot be reduced by reason of costs for health insurance or the one that states that it may?

Previously, we observed how little the health insurance provision of section 34 has been litigated. This statutory conflict may well change that. As divorce mediators, we help our clients address these matters practically, but as divorce arbitrators, we await, and now need, appellate clarification.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


Divorce Agreements special master Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Chouteau Levine Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediators alimony law divorce process mediators alimony reform legislation traditional negotiations Massachusetts divorce mediators how baseball arbitration works divorce mediation lawyers Massachusetts alimony divorce agreement family law arbitrator Family Law Arbitration medical benefits lawyer divorce and family law mediators LDRC mediator Massachusetts family support SJC Same Sex Marriage child support Levine Dispute Resolution Center rehabilitative alimony support orders Levine Dispute Resolution family law med/arb Baseball mediation resolve disputes DOMA The Seven Sins of Alimony arbitrator facilitated negotiations Alimony Reform Act disputes lawyer-attended mediation private dispute resolution divorce arbitrator Cohabitation Child Support Guidelines fraud arbitration litigation divorce litigation family law mediation COLA IRC §2704 self-adjusting alimony Obamacare Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth health insurance annulment pre-ARA alimony Uniform Arbitration Act alimony orders Massachusetts alimony and child support family mediation divorce mediator arbitrators divorced General term alimony Twinkies Boston conciliation health coverage divorce arbitration Matrimonial Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Divorce high-risk methodology divorce and family law divorce lawyers separation divorce arbitrators mediations Massachusetts lawyers Self-adjusting alimony orders MLB labor agreement med-arb Baseball Arbitration alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration dispute resolution family and probate law disputes divorce mediations Defense of Marriage Act divorce judgment Baseball Players alimony statute family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC