Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


LDRC lawyer-attended mediation Massachusetts lawyers mediations divorce arbitrator Obamacare divorce and family law mediators fraud alimony Boston divorce and family law health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution Center arbitrators health insurance med/arb divorce mediations divorce agreement alimony law Levine Dispute Resolutions Baseball Arbitration arbitration Baseball Players DOMA pre-ARA alimony Child Support Guidelines support orders divorce mediators facilitated negotiations Divorce resolve disputes Defense of Marriage Act divorce judgment General term alimony high-risk methodology divorced child support alimony statute divorce mediation special master medical benefits disputes divorce litigation lawyer family law arbitrators divorce mediator litigation mediators self-adjusting alimony The Seven Sins of Alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC mediator Massachusetts Same Sex Marriage Family Law Arbitration family support Matrimonial Arbitration alimony reform legislation lawyers Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrators divorce arbitration Baseball med-arb SJC Divorce Agreements Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family law mediation private dispute resolution COLA MLB labor agreement Chouteau Levine how baseball arbitration works Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce lawyers family law Self-adjusting alimony orders Uniform Arbitration Act traditional negotiations alimony orders arbitrator Massachusetts divorce mediators dispute resolution family mediation Massachusetts alimony rehabilitative alimony mediation Cohabitation Massachusetts divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Twinkies Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly family law arbitrator annulment divorce process family and probate law disputes IRC §2704 separation conciliation Major League Baseball Arbitration