781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

special master mediators divorced Boston family mediation medical benefits facilitated negotiations Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth health coverage Levine Dispute Resolution alimony law Major League Baseball Arbitration mediator rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center fraud family law COLA annulment self-adjusting alimony high-risk methodology arbitration Defense of Marriage Act MLB labor agreement med-arb alimony orders Alimony Reform Act mediations Cohabitation Uniform Arbitration Act health insurance med/arb Baseball Players family and probate law disputes Same Sex Marriage Divorce Agreements Child Support Guidelines divorce mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly LDRC divorce and family law family law mediation divorce litigation Twinkies divorce mediations lawyer divorce arbitrator family support divorce agreement dispute resolution separation divorce and family law mediators divorce arbitration divorce judgment General term alimony divorce lawyers alimony statute alimony DOMA SJC divorce arbitrators pre-ARA alimony lawyer-attended mediation conciliation Divorce Obamacare The Seven Sins of Alimony Family Law Arbitration arbitrators family law arbitrators Levine Dispute Resolutions Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts alimony and child support Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts divorce mediators Baseball divorce process support orders traditional negotiations child support disputes resolve disputes lawyers Chouteau Levine mediation private dispute resolution Matrimonial Arbitration IRC §2704 arbitrator family law arbitrator Massachusetts Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony reform legislation Massachusetts lawyers divorce mediator Massachusetts alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act litigation divorce mediators how baseball arbitration works