781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

#marriedseparateddivorcedcohabitedmarrieddivorced: The SJC makes it up and gets it right: Duff-Kareores v. Kareores – Part 3

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

In our last two entries, we considered the central features of the Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) recent case, Duff-Kareores v. Kareores. Today, we comment briefly on a collateral benefit of the SJC’s opinion in another area the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3.1.12) (ARA): the “common household” provision of in M.G.L., ch. 208, § 49(d). In its decision, the high court lifted the enumerated criteria of §49(d) (how to prove common household) and grafted them onto §48 (how to prove length of marriage to equitably pre-marital economic partnership during cohabitation).

In doing so, the SJC described §49(d) as the factual basis upon which a judge may reduce, suspend or terminate alimony by reason of a relationship that:

“…resembles, but is not equivalent to a legal marriage.”

In this dictum, the SJC says what the legislature did not with the greatest clarity: that the purpose of §49(d) is to give potential recourse to an alimony payor, without the burden of proving abated financial “need”, when an alimony recipient has assumed a marriage-like relationship. In the bare statute, the only word that connotes this meaning is “couple”, appearing in sub-sections ii. and v.; the dictionary meaning of which is not limited to romantic pairings. (See, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/couple.)

We hope that this collateral comment by the SJC will caution any future litigant against stretching the benefits of §49(d) beyond what we believe be its intended purpose.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

Massachusetts divorce and family law Boston divorce mediations pre-ARA alimony separation alimony statute lawyers mediator family mediation The Seven Sins of Alimony medical benefits Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce arbitration arbitration IRC §2704 family and probate law disputes lawyer health insurance conciliation Child Support Guidelines dispute resolution traditional negotiations family law mediation child support med-arb health coverage MLB labor agreement divorce process mediation divorced Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony reform legislation Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediators Massachusetts lawyers how baseball arbitration works lawyer-attended mediation Obamacare alimony Matrimonial Arbitration Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediations Chouteau Levine LDRC Family Law Arbitration annulment facilitated negotiations disputes COLA Baseball Arbitration Same Sex Marriage Alimony Reform Act family law arbitrators divorce judgment divorce lawyers divorce agreement rehabilitative alimony Baseball Players arbitrators mediators Levine Dispute Resolution Center Levine Dispute Resolution family law med/arb Divorce Agreements Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts alimony divorce mediation Defense of Marriage Act Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce litigation divorce mediator self-adjusting alimony SJC fraud Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC private dispute resolution General term alimony family support arbitrator high-risk methodology Twinkies Uniform Arbitration Act resolve disputes family law arbitrator special master Divorce Baseball Cohabitation divorce and family law mediators litigation alimony orders support orders DOMA divorce arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrator Major League Baseball Arbitration alimony law