Divorce Mediation Blog

Dependency Exemptions After Divorce: A Good Reminder From the Appeals Court

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

In a recent case, the Massachusetts Appeals Court revisited the federal tax code’s provisions on the allocation of child dependency exemptions between divorced parents. In upholding a probate judge’s decision to award a child’s exemption to the non-custodial but child support-paying father, over the mother’s objection, the appellate court reviewed current tax regulations and concluded that state courts continue to have the power to direct the exemptions as deemed appropriate.

But, but that since the court’s judgment alone is insufficient to satisfy the IRS’ requirement that the custodial parent “release” the exemption, the appellate opinion clarified that the trial court must also specifically order the custodial parent to sign [and presumably deliver] an IRS Form 8332 release to make the assignment effective. The failure to sign or deliver the form, then, becomes the state court enforcement (contempt) trigger.

At first glance, we wondered: “why did they bother?” Most divorce lawyers are familiar with Form 8332 and its effect. Then, we asked why she bothered. The mother appeared to have no financial stake in the outcome of her own appeal (for which she presumably paid legal fees), since her income was too low to have the exemption save her any tax dollars, even if she did wrest the exemption back from the father. Perhaps, the associated federal tax credits made the exercise worthwhile, or maybe her motivations were non-financial.

Then, on second thought, we realized that the case is a useful reminder to all family law drafters. This includes Massachusetts divorce mediators who write separation agreements, lawyers who draft proposed judgments for judges and suggested awards for divorce arbitrators, and for arbitrators themselves, that best practice dictates that dependency exemption provisions make reference to Form 8332 and place an affirmative obligation on the releasing party to sign and deliver. Otherwise, a client who does have a discernible stake in the having the dependency exemption just may not get it.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce lawyers alimony orders Massachusetts Cohabitation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediator support orders rehabilitative alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Defense of Marriage Act divorce arbitration divorced divorce and family law Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act family law child support litigation divorce arbitrators Alimony Reform Act health insurance family law arbitrators alimony law lawyers medical benefits annulment Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC traditional negotiations resolve disputes DOMA divorce and family law mediators Self-adjusting alimony orders med-arb divorce judgment Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts alimony divorce litigation private dispute resolution lawyer Matrimonial Arbitration divorce arbitrator conciliation divorce mediators Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth arbitrators self-adjusting alimony alimony statute IRC §2704 Chouteau Levine mediations divorce agreement Child Support Guidelines SJC health coverage The Seven Sins of Alimony alimony reform legislation Massachusetts alimony and child support fraud facilitated negotiations family and probate law disputes pre-ARA alimony Levine Dispute Resolutions Boston Baseball Arbitration divorce mediation Twinkies divorce mediations family law arbitrator General term alimony mediator alimony how baseball arbitration works med/arb arbitration family mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators Baseball mediation Baseball Players Divorce Massachusetts lawyers Major League Baseball Arbitration LDRC family support family law mediation high-risk methodology Levine Dispute Resolution Center Family Law Arbitration Same Sex Marriage dispute resolution divorce process MLB labor agreement mediators disputes arbitrator Obamacare lawyer-attended mediation special master Divorce Agreements separation COLA