Divorce Mediation Blog

Appointed Arbitrators and Masters

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Increasingly, litigation parties whose disputes elude settlement are opting out of the public trial process and electing private resolution services instead. Sometimes, the mutual recognition of the need to “go private” itself unlocks the capacity to agree on substantive points; but often the parties remain fixed in their negotiating positions, despite the recognition that they share important process interests. For these people, third-party decision-making remains necessary.

Contracting parties may, for a variety of reasons, conclude that future disputes may well occur, yet they share an interest in avoiding litigation. Therefore, they designate an arbitrator before whom to air future controversies. The arbitrator holds the power make “awards” that are final and binding (subject in the case of child support and child custody matters to review by the court for “best interests”). If the designated arbitrator becomes unable or unwilling to serve, the parties may designate the court as the agent to appoint another arbitrator.

The decision to seek private adjudication may also arise from the litigation process itself. In these cases, the result may be arbitration, but it may also take the form of a court-appointed “master”. A master sits as an agent of the court, holding hearings, considering evidence, finding “facts” and recommending resolutions. The master’s work is subject to review by the appointing court, most often resulting in adoption of the master’s results.

In either case, the parties have asserted control over their own destiny, despite their inability to achieve substantive settlement. They select their decision-maker and conduct hearings at times and with rules to which they themselves agree, with efficiency and privacy maximized.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


medical benefits mediation Divorce Agreements mediations health coverage alternative dispute resolutions divorce mediations high-risk methodology mediator Levine Dispute Resolution family and probate law disputes Family Law Arbitration Divorce disputes divorce mediation health insurance arbitrators Alimony Reform Act special master Levine Dispute Resolutions Uniform Arbitration Act Massachusetts divorce mediators conciliation lawyer-attended mediation Cohabitation dispute resolution alimony laws family law Baseball Players Massachusetts alimony traditional negotiations resolve disputes facilitated negotiations divorce arbitrator med/arb family mediation med-arb family law arbitrator Child Support Guidelines divorce and family law Baseball alimony reform legislation mediators divorce process Boston arbitrator Massachusetts alimony and child support divorce mediators Massachusetts lawyers lawyers SJC Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth family law arbitrators Matrimonial Arbitration LDRC Defense of Marriage Act alimony divorce judgment self-adjusting alimony Major League Baseball Arbitration support orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC IRC §2704 divorce agreement rehabilitative alimony Baseball Arbitration Self-adjusting alimony orders divorced MLB labor agreement family support Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly divorce mediator private dispute resolution divorce and family law mediators alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution Center COLA alimony law General term alimony alimony orders divorce litigation divorce arbitrators litigation Massachusetts separation lawyer child support how baseball arbitration works Chouteau Levine family law mediation DOMA Twinkies divorce arbitration divorce lawyers pre-ARA alimony Same Sex Marriage Obamacare The Seven Sins of Alimony arbitration Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act