781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform: One Year Later – Part 2

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

In our last entry, we explored some of the self-reflection in the legal community about the experience and leanings of Probate and Family Court judges in applying the new Massachusetts alimony laws, one year after enactment. We noted three apparent points of emerging consensus. Here, we discuss two areas of substantial disagreement among judges, which in turn limit lawyers and parties’ sense of predictability of result in court.

  1. The statute that became effective on March 1, 2012, requires that a judge either reduce, suspend or terminate alimony when the recipient has maintained a “common household” (called cohabitation) for more that three-month’s time. Before the ink on the act dried, lawyers were debating if a cohabitation that had begun before March 1, 2012 could form the basis for mandatory action by a judge after the effective date of the act; or if the common household had to begin post-March 1st to make action by the court mandatory. (The court has long had the right but not the obligation to alter an alimony obligation for a cohabitation that results in diminished need for alimony for decades.) It appears that the trial court judges are split on this, resulting in conflicting orders in different courts.
  2. The new statute mandates durational limits for what it calls “general term alimony” (that is, a maximum length of alimony payments based on the number of months of marriages of fewer than 20 years duration). The statute is silent about when the term of alimony begins: whether at the date of the divorce judgment, or at the earlier date of the start of “temporary orders” (court ordered support payments during the pendency of a divorce case, which can be one to many years in length). No consensus is apparent, which is not surprising given the statute’s lack of direction.
  3. It is the nature of complicated statutes that different judges will apply it differently. This does not reflect poorly on judges at all, but demonstrates their ability and willingness to think and to apply their own sense of reason to an unclear statutory mandate. In time, those areas will become clarified through what is called “case law”, or decisions by appellate courts based on people’s appeals from the Probate and Family Court. A statute as comprehensive and broadly used as this one, which is applied every single day in the Commonwealth, will take many years to interpret, to flesh out and to fully understand.

And, in all likelihood, the statute will be amended further by the legislature.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

special master med/arb fraud Massachusetts alimony family mediation MLB labor agreement traditional negotiations divorce agreement family law arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders alimony reform legislation lawyer-attended mediation medical benefits The Seven Sins of Alimony arbitration resolve disputes DOMA conciliation Obamacare med-arb family and probate law disputes support orders Levine Dispute Resolutions alimony statute Divorce divorce mediators family law Matrimonial Arbitration separation SJC divorce and family law mediators divorce and family law Cohabitation Massachusetts lawyers Defense of Marriage Act divorce arbitration Major League Baseball Arbitration divorce arbitrators divorce process Baseball Arbitration divorce mediations litigation lawyers rehabilitative alimony divorce judgment Massachusetts health insurance family law arbitrators Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Massachusetts divorce lawyers family support Boston how baseball arbitration works dispute resolution Twinkies IRC §2704 pre-ARA alimony divorced alimony orders Uniform Arbitration Act Family Law Arbitration high-risk methodology facilitated negotiations annulment mediator Baseball Massachusetts divorce mediators mediators divorce mediator private dispute resolution self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts alimony and child support LDRC divorce lawyers Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC General term alimony health coverage mediations COLA arbitrators alimony Divorce Agreements Levine Dispute Resolution Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act alimony law disputes Child Support Guidelines mediation arbitrator Baseball Players Chouteau Levine divorce litigation divorce arbitrator child support Same Sex Marriage Levine Dispute Resolution Center lawyer divorce mediation family law mediation Alimony Reform Act