Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform: One Year Later – Part 2

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

In our last entry, we explored some of the self-reflection in the legal community about the experience and leanings of Probate and Family Court judges in applying the new Massachusetts alimony laws, one year after enactment. We noted three apparent points of emerging consensus. Here, we discuss two areas of substantial disagreement among judges, which in turn limit lawyers and parties’ sense of predictability of result in court.

  1. The statute that became effective on March 1, 2012, requires that a judge either reduce, suspend or terminate alimony when the recipient has maintained a “common household” (called cohabitation) for more that three-month’s time. Before the ink on the act dried, lawyers were debating if a cohabitation that had begun before March 1, 2012 could form the basis for mandatory action by a judge after the effective date of the act; or if the common household had to begin post-March 1st to make action by the court mandatory. (The court has long had the right but not the obligation to alter an alimony obligation for a cohabitation that results in diminished need for alimony for decades.) It appears that the trial court judges are split on this, resulting in conflicting orders in different courts.
  2. The new statute mandates durational limits for what it calls “general term alimony” (that is, a maximum length of alimony payments based on the number of months of marriages of fewer than 20 years duration). The statute is silent about when the term of alimony begins: whether at the date of the divorce judgment, or at the earlier date of the start of “temporary orders” (court ordered support payments during the pendency of a divorce case, which can be one to many years in length). No consensus is apparent, which is not surprising given the statute’s lack of direction.
  3. It is the nature of complicated statutes that different judges will apply it differently. This does not reflect poorly on judges at all, but demonstrates their ability and willingness to think and to apply their own sense of reason to an unclear statutory mandate. In time, those areas will become clarified through what is called “case law”, or decisions by appellate courts based on people’s appeals from the Probate and Family Court. A statute as comprehensive and broadly used as this one, which is applied every single day in the Commonwealth, will take many years to interpret, to flesh out and to fully understand.

And, in all likelihood, the statute will be amended further by the legislature.

Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:

Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles

recent posts


divorce agreement health coverage divorce judgment mediation family law arbitrator Matrimonial Arbitration divorce arbitrators Massachusetts lawyers The Seven Sins of Alimony resolve disputes Uniform Arbitration Act lawyer rehabilitative alimony divorce and family law mediators Boston family law IRC §2704 lawyers dispute resolution traditional negotiations Massachusetts alimony and child support Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly alimony law DOMA SJC Baseball Players Cohabitation Levine Dispute Resolution alimony orders disputes child support family support alimony litigation Same Sex Marriage alimony statute health insurance family law arbitrators Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce litigation mediator Defense of Marriage Act Levine Dispute Resolutions Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth Alimony Reform Act arbitration divorce mediations mediators Baseball Arbitration conciliation mediations special master alimony laws Child Support Guidelines Family Law Arbitration MLB labor agreement alimony reform legislation family mediation divorce arbitrator Chouteau Levine arbitrator Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce mediation private dispute resolution lawyer-attended mediation divorce process arbitrators self-adjusting alimony Baseball Massachusetts Levine Dispute Resolution Center Twinkies divorce arbitration divorce mediators Divorce Massachusetts alimony how baseball arbitration works General term alimony Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Massachusetts divorce mediators divorce lawyers support orders separation divorce mediator Major League Baseball Arbitration med-arb facilitated negotiations Divorce Agreements divorced med/arb pre-ARA alimony divorce and family law LDRC COLA alternative dispute resolutions family and probate law disputes Obamacare high-risk methodology family law mediation medical benefits