781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

Alimony Reform and Child Support Changes: Judge Ginsburg’s View

Wednesday, June 04, 2014

In the April 14, 2014 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, the most thoughtful Massachusetts Probate and Family Court judge of his generation, Hon. Edward M. Ginsburg (ret), laments that 2012’s alimony overhaul by the legislature and 2013’s quadrennial review and revisions to the child support guidelines by the Trial Court add up to a giant missed opportunity, and a failure that will hurt families for years to come. Specifically, Judge Ginsburg, who devoted a good chunk of his two decades on the bench to advocating for predictability and consistency in all things support points out that no one thought to look at spousal support and child support as a piece. He is right.

We have all been focused intensely on how the new alimony laws work; how the new guidelines work; and how we might manipulate the two into making sensible orders that are tax-efficient. But in debating the trees, we lost sight of the forest: why didn’t the lawmakers look at these two cognate and connected subjects as two parts of the same puzzle that they are? How do we rationalize two sets of support theory into a fair, efficient and sustainable whole, not just for the privileged few who will take the time in mediation, or with sophisticated counsel, to develop a custom-made support regime, but for everyone? Reform is not reform without addressing all relevant considerations; and here, half the house was built as a tudor and the other side a cape. The result is a leaky home.

An example. We recently had to explain the following muddle to mediation clients. Under the new child support guidelines, a mother with 2 children would often receive 18.4% of the Husband’s gross income as child support, and no alimony, he having income of about $200,000.00 per year. The same woman learned that if she had no kids at all, she might expect 30 – 35% of the very same income, as alimony. Granted, we explained, taxable income is worth less than its gross sum. But is it worth less that 18.4% on the gross? Not likely.

Another example. As we have discussed here before, the alimony law says that the court may not take dollars into account that have already been tapped for child support, suggesting that child support is computed first on income up to $250,000.00 per year, with excess income only being addressed for alimony. Meanwhile, the child support guidelines say that the court may calculate alimony first, and then child support. We have argued before that sound discretion and good divorce mediation can turn these conflicts into opportunity in the search for a sensible result. But the legal inconsistency is undeniable.

Would it not have made sense for some body to review the matter of family support as of a whole? Is it too late?

Thanks to Judge Ginsburg for this valuable and disturbing insight.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

traditional negotiations Uniform Arbitration Act family support DOMA alimony divorce agreement Alimony Reform Act divorce lawyers mediation divorce judgment Same Sex Marriage alimony reform legislation divorce arbitrators conciliation rehabilitative alimony Cohabitation special master health coverage Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly arbitrator resolve disputes lawyer disputes divorce process Major League Baseball Arbitration mediator Levine Dispute Resolution Child Support Guidelines medical benefits Massachusetts alimony divorce mediator self-adjusting alimony Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act divorce litigation mediations private dispute resolution med/arb alimony orders The Seven Sins of Alimony Defense of Marriage Act child support lawyer-attended mediation divorce and family law divorce mediations how baseball arbitration works support orders family law Twinkies arbitrators alimony statute Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Levine Dispute Resolution Center family law mediation high-risk methodology pre-ARA alimony Self-adjusting alimony orders divorce arbitrator arbitration alimony law Massachusetts divorce lawyers IRC §2704 mediators divorced Boston divorce mediators divorce and family law mediators separation Divorce Matrimonial Arbitration Levine Dispute Resolutions Divorce Agreements LDRC Baseball Players Massachusetts lawyers litigation Obamacare General term alimony divorce mediation Chouteau Levine family mediation Massachusetts divorce mediators Massachusetts lawyers annulment divorce arbitration Massachusetts alimony and child support family law arbitrator Family Law Arbitration Baseball Arbitration Baseball dispute resolution family law arbitrators fraud COLA health insurance SJC family and probate law disputes facilitated negotiations MLB labor agreement med-arb