781.708.4445

info@levinedisputeresolution.com

Divorce Mediation Blog

A Prenup Head Shaker from the Appeals Court: Stacy v. Stacy

Wednesday, January 04, 2017

In a Rule 1:28 Memorandum and Order, a panel of the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that a pre-marital agreement applied to the death of a spouse, based on contract language that described its scope. Here is that term, fully as reported in the opinion, but broken down by clause:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended, in the event of divorce.

Yet, here is how the Appeals Court must have read it:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters[.]

    [ ]

    [ ]

The appellate panel tossed out two of the three clauses, which spoke only of divorce, consigned as surplusage, unworthy of consideration, despite the “agreement’s caption referring to G.L., c. 208, §34”, the divorce property division statute.

Now,, let’s cast the provision in the way that is consistent with the maxim that words in a contract are to be accorded meaning within customary everyday usage, with the law of pre-marital agreements that requires that waivers be explicit and the highly probable intent of the parties:

    … a final and complete settlement of all matters relating to the interest and obligations of each [party] with respect to all future property matters, in the event of divorce [,] including but not limited to alimony, support, maintenance, property assignment, and the rights of the parties under G.L., c. 208, §34, as amended[.]

Do you think that the parties’ might have used the word “death” somewhere, if they intended to cover that contingency? Or “estate”? Bequest”? Maybe, “inheritance”? Even “survivor”?

The result is that a widow, with no hint of pending divorce, or even marital strain, must now answer to her sister-in-law (the estate’s personal representative) for “several furnishings and personal belongings” that she removed from her marital home, in part, for alleged violation of a premarital agreement that was to all appearances, extinguished by her husband’s death.

We have no quarrel with the Appeals Court remand on the grounds that a violation of G. L. c. 190B, § 3-709 may have occurred, or that the alleged facts were also sufficient to state claims of a conversion, an unjust enrichment, and a constructive trust. But the Appeals Court is makes unnecessary mischief by inferring intent that doesn’t appear in, or even between the lines of, the contract.



Get e-mail notifications of new blog posts! Enter email address below.:



Delivered by FeedBurner

other articles


recent posts


tags

arbitrators private dispute resolution family law mediation Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly mediations mediators Massachusetts alimony and child support med-arb Act Reforming Alimony in the Commonwealth divorce mediation family law arbitration DOMA resolve disputes divorce process Massachusetts Alimony Reform Act Self-adjusting alimony orders Levine Dispute Resolution Center family and probate law disputes lawyer-attended mediation Baseball Arbitration Massachusetts Same Sex Marriage med/arb annulment rehabilitative alimony Massachusetts divorce mediators mediation child support Massachusetts alimony high-risk methodology family law arbitrator health coverage Divorce Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC Levine Dispute Resolutions divorce mediations The Seven Sins of Alimony Uniform Arbitration Act pre-ARA alimony divorce litigation Obamacare family mediation Boston traditional negotiations Chouteau Levine self-adjusting alimony separation mediator facilitated negotiations dispute resolution Divorce Agreements LDRC divorce judgment divorce mediator medical benefits General term alimony health insurance Child Support Guidelines alimony reform legislation divorce and family law alimony orders family support conciliation divorce mediators Cohabitation lawyer divorce arbitrators divorce and family law mediators arbitrator Baseball Players family law arbitrators alimony divorce arbitration Levine Dispute Resolution disputes Massachusetts lawyers alimony law IRC §2704 divorce agreement divorce lawyers Matrimonial Arbitration Twinkies MLB labor agreement Family Law Arbitration how baseball arbitration works Baseball divorced fraud Major League Baseball Arbitration litigation alimony statute Defense of Marriage Act special master lawyers COLA Alimony Reform Act divorce arbitrator support orders SJC